SKU: 1252361412
oil for fiddle leaf fig

oil for fiddle leaf fig Liquid Fertilizer for Fiddle Leaf Figs

Sale price$19.30 Regular price$21.45
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.36 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 11 - Aug 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

oil for fiddle leaf fig Liquid Fertilizer for Fiddle Leaf FigsBest Liquid Fertilizer for Fiddle Leaf Fig Trees Perfect Plants' Liquid Fig Food promotes huge leaves and fewer brown spots Fiddle leaf fig trees are popular houseplants that most houseplant lovers seek out even though beginners may find them finicky to care for. Theyre worth the wait, though, since their deep green glossy leaves are beautiful to look at! Our liquid fiddle leaf fig fertilizer will help your plant stay happy and shiny and take a lot of

Best Liquid Fertilizer for Fiddle Leaf Fig Trees

Perfect Plants' Liquid Fig Food promotes huge leaves and fewer brown spots

Fiddle leaf fig trees are popular houseplants that most houseplant lovers seek out even though beginners may find them finicky to care for. They’re worth the wait, though, since their deep green glossy leaves are beautiful to look at! Our liquid fiddle leaf fig fertilizer will help your plant stay happy and shiny and take a lot of the struggle out of caring for it!

This fiddle leaf fig fertilizer has an NPK ratio of 9-3-6, allowing the plant to develop healthy foliage. It also contains calcium, magnesium, sulfur, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc, all of which help the plant grow steadily and strongly. When you follow the directions on the bottle, your plant will receive the appropriate amount of nutrients it needs.

Apply this mixture when it’s time to water your plant. You can mix this fertilizer solution into a container of water and apply as little or as much as you need it. The prepared mixture can be stored and saved for next time, so you don’t have to worry about wasting the excess.

While this liquid fiddle leaf fig fertilizer will provide your plant with all the nutrients it needs, you can give your plant an extra boost with our Fiddle Leaf Fig Soil to help it develop strong roots and broad leaves.

How to Fertilize Fiddle Leaf Fig with Liquid Fertilizer

Mix one teaspoon of the liquid fertilizer into one gallon of water. You can make more if you need to as long as you follow the same ratio of fertilizer and water. You can store extra fertilizer in a container and use it next time. So, if one gallon is too much, you don’t have to throw it away.

You don’t have to follow special directions to apply the fertilizer to your plant. Water your fiddle leaf fig as usual but use the fertilizer instead of regular water when it’s time to feed your plant. It’s as easy as that! 

How Often to Fertilize Fiddle Leaf Fig with Liquid Fertilizer

Knowing when to fertilize fiddle leaf figs is essential since an unhappy plant will die quickly. 

We recommend fertilizing once every two weeks in spring and summer and once a month in the winter for the best results. Not every plant is the same, however, so you may need to adjust how often you fertilize it based on its needs.

You can tell when it’s time to water your plant when the top two inches of the soil are dry. Feel the soil with your finger before you water it so you can be sure it’s time to water so you don’t accidentally give it too much water.

Your fiddle leaf fig will have crunchy brown leaves if your plant doesn’t have enough water. A severely underwatered plant is difficult to bring back, so it’s important to start watering it more frequently right away.

If your plant develops yellow leaves, it’s likely because it has too much water. Water less frequently and only when the top two inches of the soil are dry.

If you start to notice your plant turning yellow or showing other signs of dying and the only difference you made to your watering schedule is the fertilizer, it might mean your plant is receiving too many nutrients. Try reducing how often you fertilize to see if your plant responds better.

Buy Liquid Fertilizer for Fiddle Leaf Figs for sale today!

Compare to our Fiddle Leaf Fig Pellet Fertilizer!

Check out the Fiddle Leaf Fig Grow Guide for more information on growing fiddle leaf figs.



            Shipping Notes
            • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
            • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
            • Delivery to the USA:
            1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
            • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
            Exchange/Return Notes
            • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
            • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
            • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
            • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
            SKU: 1252361412

            Discover Niche Categories That Outsell oil for fiddle leaf fig

            Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

            4.4 ★★★★★
            Based on 29 reviews
            Sort
            Highest Rating
            Newest First
            Oldest First
            Product Reviews
            S
            Verified Purchase
            slimwriter
            Phoenix, US
            ★★★★★ 2
            Not sour
            Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
            WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
            Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
            M
            Verified Purchase
            Moon Riley
            Los Angeles, US
            ★★★★★ 5
            Sugar free
            Tastes great
            WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
            Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
            M
            Verified Purchase
            Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
            Los Angeles, US
            ★★★★★ 5
            Dude, it's not just a horror novel
            Format: Paperback
            This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
            WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
            Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
            R
            Verified Purchase
            RC Mom
            Port Orchard, US
            ★★★★★ 5
            Good experience
            Format: Paperback
            It was all good.
            WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
            Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025
            B
            Verified Purchase
            Brian J. Buckley
            Port Orchard, US
            ★★★★★ 4
            Love the Edition and Footnotes; Don't need the Cultural Criticisms
            Format: Paperback
            The layout of the book and the footnotes are each great. What mars the book, unfortunately, is the editor's need to make simplistic statements about cultural elements. Several times, for example, he addresses "feminism," even using the term "Franken-feminists" in a puerile manner at one point. As too many of these conservative Catholics do, he simplifies and comments about modern culture without nuance. In this case, it is simply unprofessional and inaccurate (i) to not capture the myriad differences in feminist thought (many of which he and his readers would accept) and (ii) thereby to make all feminists the same (e.g,, assuming the feminists of the 1970's are the same as today's.) This is all unfortunate because when he is just addressing the literary elements of the book, his comments are wonderful and helpful to the reader. Any reader should know that this presentation will be tilted in an unsophisticated and simplistic way toward a traditional Catholic view (a view that can indeed be defended well while still being careful and charitable to critics). With that caveat, he (or she) should still buy it and garner a good edition of the text.
            WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
            Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024

            recommand products