SKU: 21982116716
thornless prickly pear cactus

thornless prickly pear cactus Cactus Spineless Prickly Pear Old Mexico – Texas Tree Farms

Sale price$25.96 Regular price$28.84
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.21 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 11 - Aug 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

thornless prickly pear cactus Cactus Spineless Prickly Pear Old Mexico – Texas Tree FarmsThe Spinless Prickly Pear "Old Mexico" is a type of spineless cactus that is prized for its smooth, paddle shaped stems (pads) and lack of spines or glochids (barbed bristles). It is a member of the Opuntia genus, which includes various species of prickly pear cacti native to North and South America. The "Old Mexico" variety typically produces vibrant green to bluish green pads that are oval or rounded in shape. In spring or early summer, it may also

The Spinless Prickly Pear "Old Mexico" is a type of spineless cactus that is prized for its smooth, paddle-shaped stems (pads) and lack of spines or glochids (barbed bristles). It is a member of the Opuntia genus, which includes various species of prickly pear cacti native to North and South America. The "Old Mexico" variety typically produces vibrant green to bluish-green pads that are oval or rounded in shape. In spring or early summer, it may also bear showy, yellow, orange, or red flowers that give way to edible fruits known as prickly pears or tunas.This cactus is tolerant of drought, heat, and poor soil conditions, making it ideal for xeriscaping, desert gardens, and low-maintenance landscapes.

Scientific Name

Opuntia gomei 'Old Mexico'

Foliage: Evergreen

The pads are very large, thick, and a beautiful wavy-edged blue-green. They are much smoother to the touch than standard cacti, though you should still handle them with gloves.

Flowers: In late spring or early summer, it produces large, gorgeous bright yellow flowers that often have a peach or orange center.

Fruit: It produces purple-to-red fruits (tunas) that are edible, though they are usually smaller and less abundant than those on the O. ficus-indica variety.

Mature Height

4-6 feet 

Mature Width (Spread)

4-6 feet 

Growth Rate

Fast (can double in size in a single  growing season)

USDA Zone

8 – 11 (Can handle light freezes, but needs protection below 20°F)


Plant Care & Characteristics

Light Requirements: Full Sun. It thrives in 6–10 hours of direct sunlight. This variety is particularly heat-loving and performs best in the hottest parts of the garden. Inadequate sunlight may result in weak, leggy growth and reduced flowering. These cacti are well-adapted to sunny, exposed sites with minimal shade.

Water Requirements: Low. It is extremely water-efficient. Prickly Pear Cacti are drought-tolerant plants that require minimal watering once established. In general, they prefer dry conditions and are susceptible to root rot if kept too wet. Water newly planted cacti sparingly (once every 2-3 weeks) if there is no rain and then allow the soil to dry out between watering. Once established, it can thrive on rainfall alone in most climates. Water only during prolonged periods of drought or extreme heat. Over-watering can be detrimental to the health of Prickly Pear Cacti and should be avoided.

Drought Resistance: Extreme. Like its thorny cousins, 'Old Mexico' stores large amounts of water in its thick, succulent pads, allowing it to survive long periods without a drop of rain.

Soil Type: Well-Drained. Drainage is the only non-negotiable requirement. It prefers sandy or rocky soil. If planting in clay, you must plant it on a "mound" or in a raised bed to ensure the roots never sit in standing water. Soil Preferences: Prickly Pear Cacti prefer well-drained, sandy or rocky soil with good drainage. Avoid planting them in areas with heavy, compacted soil or where water tends to pool after rain. If necessary, amend the soil with sand, gravel, or organic matter to improve drainage.

Deer Resistance: Moderate to High. Since it lacks long spines, it is slightly more vulnerable to curious wildlife than thorny types. However, the thick skin and presence of tiny glochids usually deter most deer.

The "Kid-Friendly" Cactus: Because the 'Old Mexico' lacks the long, "jumping" spines of the Cholla or the 2-inch thorns of the standard Prickly Pear, 'Old Mexico' is the #1 choice for Xeriscaping (water-wise landscaping) in residential areas. It can be planted near patios or walkways where a thorny cactus would be a safety hazard.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 21982116716

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell thornless prickly pear cactus

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
R
Verified Purchase
RC Mom
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Good experience
Format: Paperback
It was all good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025
B
Verified Purchase
Brian J. Buckley
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Love the Edition and Footnotes; Don't need the Cultural Criticisms
Format: Paperback
The layout of the book and the footnotes are each great. What mars the book, unfortunately, is the editor's need to make simplistic statements about cultural elements. Several times, for example, he addresses "feminism," even using the term "Franken-feminists" in a puerile manner at one point. As too many of these conservative Catholics do, he simplifies and comments about modern culture without nuance. In this case, it is simply unprofessional and inaccurate (i) to not capture the myriad differences in feminist thought (many of which he and his readers would accept) and (ii) thereby to make all feminists the same (e.g,, assuming the feminists of the 1970's are the same as today's.) This is all unfortunate because when he is just addressing the literary elements of the book, his comments are wonderful and helpful to the reader. Any reader should know that this presentation will be tilted in an unsophisticated and simplistic way toward a traditional Catholic view (a view that can indeed be defended well while still being careful and charitable to critics). With that caveat, he (or she) should still buy it and garner a good edition of the text.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024

recommand products