SKU: 35300427272
buy lavender plant near me

buy lavender plant near me Lavandula Angustifolia (English Lavender) – Yardwork

Sale price$26.75 Regular price$29.72
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.43 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 12 - Aug 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

buy lavender plant near me Lavandula Angustifolia (English Lavender) – YardworkTransform Your Garden with Californias Most Beloved Fragrant Perennial Lavandula angustifolia, commonly known as English lavender or true lavender, is a drought tolerant, highly fragrant perennial that brings silver gray texture, purple flowers, and Mediterranean charm to California gardens with minimal water once established. Native to the Mediterranean region, this cold hardy lavender thrives in full sun, dry summers, and well drained soil, making

Transform Your Garden with California’s Most Beloved Fragrant Perennial

Lavandula angustifolia, commonly known as English lavender or true lavender, is a drought tolerant, highly fragrant perennial that brings silver-gray texture, purple flowers, and Mediterranean charm to California gardens with minimal water once established.

Native to the Mediterranean region, this cold hardy lavender thrives in full sun, dry summers, and well drained soil, making it ideal for drought-conscious landscapes, herb gardens, rock gardens, containers, and low hedge planting. English lavender grows in tidy rounded mounds, offering year-round gray green foliage and dense flower spikes that add vibrant color from late spring into summer.

Why You’ll Love English Lavender

  • Drought-tolerant once established – This plant is drought-tolerant once established, making it an excellent choice for low-maintenance gardens in dry climates. Once established, English lavender should only be watered during dry periods, approximately once a week.

  • Beautiful seasonal bloom with the potential for a second flush – English lavender produces fragrant flower spikes in late spring to summer, and deadheading spent flowers can help promote continued bloom. With proper pruning, some lavender varieties may produce more blooms or a lighter second flush later in the season.

  • Naturally deer and rabbit resistant – English lavender is deer and rabbit resistant due to its aromatic oils, which deter browsing by wildlife and help protect nearby plants.

  • Pollinator-friendly and pest-discouraging – English lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) is highly fragrant and attracts pollinators like bees and butterflies, enhancing garden biodiversity while its essential oil scent helps discourage many nuisance pests.

  • Useful beyond the garden – Lavandula angustifolia is widely used in culinary applications, aromatherapy, and high-end perfumery. Inhaling lavender vapor reduces anxiety and promotes relaxation, while harvested flowers are popular for sachets, dried arrangements, teas, desserts, and herb blends.

What Makes English Lavender Different

Many gardeners assume all lavender varieties are the same. They are not. L. angustifolia stands apart for its refined fragrance, compact form, cold tolerance, and premium essential oil quality.

Lavandula Angustifolia (English Lavender) provides:

  • More cold hardy than many other lavenders – Lavandula angustifolia is cold-hardy and can survive freezing winters, thriving in USDA Zones 5–9. Where temperatures dip, established plants may benefit from excellent drainage and, in colder areas, protective snow cover.

  • Sweeter, cleaner fragrance – True lavender is prized for essential oil with a softer, more floral character than many French, Spanish, or lavandin types. This makes English lavender especially valuable for aromatherapy, culinary use, and high-end perfumery.

  • Compact growth for real landscapes – The plant reaches a compact height of roughly 2 to 3 feet and features thin, silver-green leaves with dense flower spikes. Its rounded mounds work beautifully in a perennial border, low hedge, rock gardens, and containers.

  • Excellent flower color options – Classic cultivars offer purple and medium purple flowers, while selections such as Hidcote Blue, Angustifolia Hidcote, Royal Velvet, Buena Vista, and Sharon Roberts are loved for deep color and strong fragrance. Jean Davis offers soft pink to light pink flowers, and some cultivars produce white flowers.

  • Long garden performance with pruning – Regular pruning is essential to maintain the mounded shape of Lavandula angustifolia and prolong its lifespan. Deadheading spent flowers and pruning correctly can help promote blooming and encourage new growth without cutting into old wood.

How to Grow English Lavender Successfully

  1. Site Selection – Choose full sun and airflow
    English lavender thrives in full sun, requiring at least 6 to 8 hours of direct sunlight each day to prevent leggy growth and promote blooming. Choose an open spot with good air circulation, especially in areas where humid climates or coastal moisture can increase the risk of leaf spot.

  2. Soil Preparation – Prioritize drainage over richness
    It requires full sun and well-drained, low-fertility soil to grow optimally. The ideal soil for English lavender is sandy or gritty, well-draining, with a pH between 6.5 and 7.5; overly rich or damp soils can lead to root rot. The ideal pH level for growing Lavandula angustifolia is between 6.7 and 7.3, preferring alkaline to neutral soil.

  3. Planting and Care – Water deeply, then let soil dry
    English lavender is drought-tolerant once established, needing watering about once a week during dry periods, and should not be overwatered as this inhibits blooming. Avoid wet feet, excess moisture, and heavy organic mulch over the crown. If you use organic mulch, keep it light and pulled away from the stems.

  4. Seasonal Maintenance – Prune for more blooms and longevity
    To promote blooming, deadhead spent flowers regularly and prune the plants in spring after new growth appears, cutting about one-third of the green stalks. Avoid cutting into old wood or woody stems, which may not regrow well. Regular pruning keeps plants dense, rounded, and productive.

English lavender is much easier to propagate through stem cuttings than by growing plants from seed. To propagate English lavender, take cuttings from healthy plants in the spring or early summer, ensuring each cutting has at least two sets of leaves. After taking cuttings, place them in a well-draining potting mix and keep them moist but not soggy until roots develop, which usually takes a few weeks.

Plant Specifications

  • Genus name: Lavandula

  • Plant type: Semi-woody perennial shrub / aromatic herb

  • Botanical name: Lavandula angustifolia

  • Common names: English lavender, true lavender, common lavender

  • Mature size: The plant reaches a compact height of roughly 2 to 3 feet and features thin, silver-green leaves with dense flower spikes. Mature spread is typically about 2 to 4 feet depending on cultivar and pruning, making it easy to use the English lavender plants available from Yardwork in borders and low hedges.

  • Growth habit: Rounded mounds with narrow leaves, gray green foliage, woody stems at the base, and upright flowering stems that contrast nicely with taller ornamental grasses like Purple Fountain Grass.

  • Flowers: Purple flowers are most common, including medium purple flowers and deep purple selections. Cultivars may also produce pink, light pink flowers, or white flowers.

  • Bloom time: Late spring through summer, with possible continued bloom or a second flush when spent flowers are removed and plants are pruned correctly.

  • Sun / Water: Full sun water needs are low once established. Provide full sun and water only during dry periods, about once a week after establishment.

  • Soil: English lavender must be planted in well-draining soil with a pH between 6.5 and 7.5, as damp soils can cause root rot. Sandy soil, gritty soil, and drained soil with excellent drainage are best.

  • Ideal pH: The ideal pH level for growing Lavandula angustifolia is between 6.7 and 7.3, preferring alkaline to neutral soil.

  • Growing zone: USDA Zones 5–9. Lavender thrives in dry summers and warm conditions but does not thrive in high humidity.

  • Spacing: Space plants 24 to 36 inches apart for a low hedge, mass planting, or perennial border with good air circulation, or combine them with structural evergreens like English Laurel (Prunus laurocerasus) for layered screening.

  • Containers: Use containers with drainage holes and a gritty, well drained potting mix. Avoid saucers that hold water, and consider pairing lavender with compact companions such as Lavender Mexican Heather in mixed containers.

  • Disease notes: English lavender is susceptible to leaf spot and root rot, which can affect its health and growth. To prevent root rot in English lavender, it is essential to avoid overwatering and ensure the soil is well-draining. Leaf spot can be managed by removing affected leaves and improving air circulation around the plants.

Perfect for California Gardeners Who Want

Ideal for:

  • Drought-tolerant landscaping that still feels lush – English lavender delivers fragrance, texture, and vibrant color while reducing long-term irrigation needs and pairs beautifully with flowering trees like the Jacaranda mimosifolia.

  • Low-maintenance borders and hedging – Use English lavender in a perennial border, along pathways, as a low hedge, or pair it with other evergreen hedge plants like English laurel around patios where the aromatic foliage can be enjoyed up close.

  • Pollinator-friendly gardens – Bees and butterflies are drawn to lavender flowers, making this plant a strong choice for biodiversity-focused California landscapes and pairing beautifully with Silver Sheen Pittosporum privacy hedges.

  • Herb gardens with culinary and aromatherapy value – Harvest flower spikes for culinary use, sachets, dried flowers, essential oil projects, and relaxation rituals, and anchor nearby views with compact ornamental trees like Little Gem Dwarf Southern Magnolia.

  • Mediterranean-style and rock gardens – Lavender thrives in dry soil, sandy soil, raised beds, slopes, and rock gardens where excellent drainage prevents root rot, and it complements other Mediterranean-style shrubs like purple bougainvillea.

If you want a fragrant, water-wise garden plant that looks refined without demanding constant care, English lavenderfits beautifully.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much water does English lavender need in California?
English lavender is drought-tolerant once established, needing watering about once a week during dry periods. Avoid overwatering, because excess moisture inhibits blooming and can cause root rot. In coastal areas, plants may need less supplemental water than in hot inland gardens.

When is the best time to plant and prune English lavender?
Plant in early spring after major frost risk has passed, or in fall where winter drainage is reliable. To promote blooming, deadhead spent flowers regularly and prune the plants in spring after new growth appears, cutting about one-third of the green stalks. Avoid pruning hard into old wood.

Can English lavender survive California’s hot summers?
Yes. This plant prefers warm conditions but does not thrive in high humidity; it is best suited for drier climates similar to its native Mediterranean environment. In very hot inland regions, lavender performs best with full sun, excellent drainage, and occasional deep watering during dry periods.

How long does it take to establish and reach full size?
English lavender grows moderately and often reaches strong garden performance within 2 to 3 years. Mature size is generally 2 to 3 feet tall with a similar or wider spread, depending on cultivar, soil, sun, water, and pruning.

What are the best companion plants for English lavender?
Choose plants with similar needs: rosemary, thyme, sage, yarrow, echinacea, ornamental grasses, and other drought tolerant shrubs or herbs. Avoid pairing lavender with plants that need rich, wet soil.

How do I prevent root rot in heavy clay soils?
To prevent root rot, plant in raised beds, amend for drainage, use gritty or sandy soil, and avoid wet feet. English lavender must be planted in well-draining soil with a pH between 6.5 and 7.5, as damp soils can cause root rot. Keep organic mulch away from the crown and avoid frequent shallow watering.

How do I manage leaf spot?
Leaf spot can be managed by removing affected leaves and improving air circulation around the plants. Proper spacing, full sun, and dry foliage are the best defenses.

Ready to Add Timeless Beauty to Your Garden?

Choose Lavandula Angustifolia (English Lavender) for fragrant flower spikes, gray green foliage, pollinator activity, and low-water Mediterranean style.

Yardwork can help you select the right lavender varieties, plan spacing for a low hedge or perennial border, and prepare your soil for long-term success with their Los Angeles plant nursery and landscaping services. Ask about expert consultation services for landscape planning and soil testing services to confirm drainage and pH before planting.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 35300427272

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell buy lavender plant near me

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
H
Verified Purchase
Henry Perkins
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 4
Great scope and central thesis, but tries too hard
[Strong 3.5 stars for its scope and development of the central thesis, but loses points for trying too hard to explain away non-European cultural failures.] The first line of Jared Diamond's Pulitzer Prize-winning opus is: "This book attempts to provide a short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years." His central thesis is that luck of genetic distribution of domesticable plants and animals, particularly cereals and large mammals, gave a tremendous leg up to western Eurasia in the development of civilization. In other words, it wasn't poor choices or innate inferiority that caused most of the world to be dominated by European culture -- just luck. In a book with greatly wider scope than most nonfiction Pulitzer winners, Diamond pulls together long-term threads of farming, herding, languages, disease, technology, government, and religion. He attempts to explain how trends in all these disparate areas rather inexorably led to the cultural and economic state of the world today. While many of the author's arguments are subject to debate, the writing is lucid; it's easy to see why the Pulitzer committee gave Diamon the prize. To take to task all the debatable points in "Guns, Germs, and Steel" would be a huge undertaking. I'll try to highlight a few. Diamond argues that the temperate Mediterranean climate (featuring wet winters and dry summers) of southwest Asia aided greatly in early development, then has to explain why similar climates in California, Chile, and southwest Australia didn't spur development in those places. Human actions (particularly deforestation and overgrazing) have turned what used to be called the "Fertile Crescent" into a wasteland, whereas this didn't happen in the similar southern European area. Thus southwestern Asia possessed the seeds of human development, but the locals squandered their head start. At that point Europe and eastern Asia had an equal chance of pulling ahead, and Diamond proposes that the geographical fragmentation of Europe gave it a competitive advantage over China's cohesiveness. But because he earlier claims that easy movement (for the spread of domesticable species) gave Europe a competitive advantage over America and Africa, this argument is not compelling. Diamond thinks that the different parts of the world were on a developmental par about 13,000 years ago. At that time there were many more potentially domesticable large mammals in the Americas than there are now. The evidence as to what the human presence at that time is mixed, but Diamond pushes hard to dispute evidence of any prior human occupation. He favors the "Clovis first" theory, which has humans first entering from Siberia across the ice age Bering land bridge not more than 13,000 years ago, carrying stone "Clovis point" weapons. Clovis points have been found in large numbers in mammoth carcasses in North America, and Diamond thinks they were developed in Asia and transported across Beringia. Mammoths are one of the many now-extinct large mammals. From the mammoth kill evidence, Diamond assumes hunting by immigrants from Siberia caused the extinction of not just mammoths but horses, elephants, lions, and all the other megafauna. But there are several problems with this argument. Firstly, there are more recent findings than those Diamond disputes to back up the earlier human occupation theory. Secondly, there are no Clovis points north of British Columbia, which would mean these genocidal immigrants fasted all through Alaska. And thirdly, while there are thousands of Clovis points in mammoth skeletons, to date we've found just ONE clovis point in an American horse carcass, and NONE in elephants, lions, or giraffes -- all at one time widely found in North America. All of this debate for later occupation of the Americas appears designed to buttress a secondary argument that American development got started too late to catch up with the Eurasians. But ironically, the Pleistocene overkill hypothesis, linked to a single overwhelming swarm of human invaders, argues against Jared Diamond's central thesis. If he's right, it WAS the Native Americans' own fault that they were later overrun by Europeans on horses, becaused they killed and ate all the existing horses on arrival. Diamond also has to resort to some hand-waving to explain why independent Mesoamerican invention of writing and wheels (used only in toys, rather than tools like wheelbarrows) never went anywhere. Similar weak arguments are used to explain why China went into cultural stagnation centuries ago. Ultimately, the author tries too hard to make all of history fit his model. In trying to explain why superior technology isn't necessarily accepted, Diamond trots out the old myth about the Dvorak keyboard being superior to the standard QWERTY layout, yet never finding much demand. However, Diamond's book came out in 1997, and the Dvorak myth had been debunked 7 years previously (Journal of Law & Economics vol. XXXIII (April 1990)). Diamond is left with no argument other than cultural superiority to explain why societies that adopt better technology succeed, and he rejects that position a priori. In his professional career the author has spent much time working in New Guinea. He thinks constant local warfare has made the average surviving New Guinea tribesman superior to the average descendant of European culture, and wants to explain why the people of New Guinea have so little "cargo" (wealth). But Diamond's focus on New Guinea as a model for global development is more elucidating to the author than to his readers. There are some problems with the book layout itself, including a surprisingly poor index. For instance, trying to look up horse extinctions in the Americas, I found references to horses under "Americas, animal extinctions in" that didn't appear under "horses, in Americas". Also, there are a variety of different maps with different levels of detail to show the migrations of peoples, languages, and domestic species. It's necessary to flip back and forth between the maps to follow the narrative thread. This is a good book to read, but a skeptical perspective is necessary while doing so.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2003
T
Verified Purchase
Tom Riddle
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 3
Guns Germs & Steel Book Review
Format: Hardcover
Guns, Germs, And Steel is an influential treatise of competitive plausibility regarding the challenging question why population groups on different continents experienced widely divergent paths of development. Contrary to the voluminous objections cited in the many of the revisionist historians and anthropologists, the famous biologist Jared Diamond tackles the most important question of global history in one compelling volume: "Why did Europeans come to dominate the New World?" This question has been answered by others before and Diamond's idea that Europe's geography is the cause geographical determinism has also been proposed before. Any student of history or anthropology can drag up a case or two of this thesis. Baron Montaigne, for example, suggested that Europe's predominance curtailed from its superior government, which could be derived directly from the coolness of its climate. However as an enthusiastic proponent of environmental determinism, Jared Diamond presents a set of premises consistent with evidence provided from a wide range of disciplines, but he does not attempt to answer the question of genetic diversity, including segregated intelligence among racial groups as many reviewers have inferred. If anything, implicitly, the author appears to support promulgations of differentiated intelligences; he sets out to demonstrate intelligence was not the root cause to Eurasian dominance. The deep significance of this book is that Diamond's thesis is not simply idle conjecture. He proves that the Eurasian land mass had by far the best biological resources with which to develop agricultural societies, and was thus more able to form large, coherent, and powerful social entities. In order to back this idea, Diamond introduces a set of well-researched data on what kinds of plants and animals are necessary to support a farming society. He investigates the biological resources available to potential farmers in all parts of the world. The people of Eurasia had access to a suite of plants and animals that provided for their needs. Potential farmers in other parts of the world did not have such access and so, their fertile soil went uncultivated. Beginning 13,000 years ago, the author illuminated the circumstances that may have smoothed growth for some groups and repressed the same for others. Diamond accepts the out of Africa theory for the dispersion of Homo sapiens to the other continents as well as the importance of location that they went. For Diamond, food production is the definitive cause of capricious rates of development for different peoples. He demonstrates how the abundance of wild plants subject to domestication and availability of large mammals served as immediate factors to transition from hunter/gatherer bands and tribes to sedentary agriculturally based chiefdoms and states. In this context, Eurasia was home to important number of crops and animals that readily and successfully domesticated. This domestication resulted in mass food production, which the author claims is the "ultimate" cause of Western dominance. Food production in turn, led to a number of adjoining causes related to the rise of the West:- farms and animal herds led to stationary populations and excess food to support a specialized class of bureaucrats and soldiers and it also increased population density. After establishing this strong foundation, Diamond falls into reiterating ideas about the creation of large-scale societies. These ideas, while clichéd, are still enthralling and Diamond presents them in a very clear and well-written way. His other major original contribution comes when he discusses the diseases that helped the Old World conquer the New World. Building on his earlier chapters dealing with Old-World domesticated animals, he shows that these very animals were the sources of the major plagues such as smallpox which virtually annihilated New World populations. The fact that Old World people had immunities to these diseases was a direct result of their agricultural head-start. Finally, Diamond concludes, the unique East-West axis of Eurasia and the absence of any impenetrable geographic barriers fostered the spread of new crops, technologies which gave rise to many competing communities, whose competition further increased the western lead over the rest of the world. These technical details, while complete, are presented in a very easy to fathomable way and Diamond's writing style is fun and engaging. Diamond's arguments are persuasive on the surface, and even the prevalent skeptic will have reason for pause after reading his book. However, I have some concerns with respect to the credibility of this book. I felt that I had to second guess most of his evidence, because it was equivocal, lacking or incorrect. Firstly, Diamond uses the term "Eurasian" to describe cultures and societies. However, the term is essentially used to describe a geographical landmass or tectonic plates. All the way through the book, he uses the term "Eurasian" when it supports his hypothesis and replaces the term with European or western Eurasian to support another part of his thesis. He does not separate Europe and Asia to explain societies and cultures even though Europe and Asia contain different religions, cultures and languages. But then again, he separates "North Africa" from "Sub-Saharan Africa" even though they are part of the same continental landmass and have more commonalties. On page 161, Diamond attempts to explain his reasoning behind using the broad and vague term "Eurasian" when he states that: "my use of the term "Eurasia" includes in several cases North Africa, which biogeographically and in many aspects of human culture is more closely related to Eurasia than to sub-Saharan Africa". I believe Diamond confuses contemporary North African culture with the cultures that inhabited Northern Africa from 10,000 BC to 8th century AD. For example, from pre-dynastic to the mid-late stages of the Ancient Egyptian civilization, the ancient Egyptians had contact and traded with cultures in Ethiopia (sub-Saharan Africa). The Ancient Egyptian and Amharic language (Ethiopia) belong to the same language group which is Afro-Asiatic, and also belong to the same sub language group, which is Semitic. Diamond makes vague generalities in supporting his thesis and fails to engage significant evidence that challenges his thesis. In addition, when studying the development of different cultures and the spread of food production and technology, he modifies the definition of different terms to fit his hypothesis. Any hypothesis can be supported if you continuously alter the variables you are challenging. I found this to be the most distracting facet of this book. He does this with the terms "North African" and "Sub-Saharan African" which are terms that carried little meaning between 13,000 BC until the 7th century, but are used to separate the significant accomplishments of Ancient Egyptians (Africans) with other Africans. On page 92, he states that: "the availability of domestic plants and animals ultimately explains why empires, literacy, and steel weapons developed earliest in Eurasia and later, or not at all, on other continents." That statement is false, since written records of the Ancient Egyptian (African) language have been dated from about 3200 BC, making it the oldest and longest documented language. The Sumerian language, as Diamond claims is the oldest language, developed around 3000 BC. Additionally, a recent archaeological discovery has suggested that some Gerzean pottery with early hieroglyphics located in Egypt could have originated since 4000 BC. Ancient Egyptians were also the first to develop mathematic concepts such as the Decimal system and science such as astronomy and medicine during that time period and significantly influenced Greek science and mathematics. Diamond does not mention any of this and I believe that he leaves out noteworthy attainments by non-Europeans to support his thesis. Throughout the book, Diamond also poses the following question in the background: "Why were Eurasians, rather than Native Americans or sub-Saharan Africans, the ones to invent firearms, oceangoing ships, and steel equipment?" Nevertheless, Diamond does not engage in the most basic question relating to the motivations of these cultures: Did Native Americans or Sub-Saharan Africans have a need for firearms/oceangoing ships? More to the point, did the Native Americans, sub-Saharan Africans, and other so-called non-Eurasians, want firearms or oceangoing ships? The answer would have forced Diamond to research the cultures and religions of Native Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans in more detail, rather than explaining it with geography and/or food production. Also, he does not include the significant accomplishments of Ancient Egypt, including papyrus, an early form of paper that originated in Africa not Europe or Asia. On page 190, Diamond states that: "Continental differences in axis orientation affected the diffusion not only of food production but also of other technologies and inventions." It is known that Ancient Egyptian technology including scientific or medical discoveries traveled along the north or south axis towards the Middle-east and eventually to ancient Greece. Diamond doesn't mention any of this, which further questions the credibility of the book. Another problem with Diamond's style is that he seems to negate the influences of Non-Europeans, specifically Africa and China, to the current Western hegemony such as gunpowder from China, natural resources from Africa by either not mentioning them at all or under-emphasizing their importance. It is quite likely that without the influences from non-European civilizations that current Western hegemony would not exist today. He also makes downright false statements such as in page 247 when he states that: "Delivered in grenades, rockets, and torpedoes, those incendiaries played a key role in Islam's eventual defeat of the Crusaders." According to historical records, there is no evidence to suggest that grenades, rockets and torpedoes were used during the Crusades. I agree that the domestication of plants and animals could predispose agriculturalists to further development. However, geography and domestication of animals and plants alone is inadequate to support his thesis without explaining the role of the people and societies occupying the geography. Geography might be a factor to explain how Western Civilization became the dominant civilization in the world today. Though, European civilization did not arise in a vacuum. Regardless of the plausible geographic advantage of Europe and Asia, factors such as political intentions, morals, ethics, religion and culture all served to explain why some civilizations were determined to expand and build empires through conquest, while others did not. Diamond claims that his theories offer an alternative explanation to traditional racist dogma. Conversely, I believe his theories do just the opposite. By stating that Europeans developed into the dominant civilization by "chance" or "luck" with respect to geography strengthens racist theories that European civilization was "destined" to become the most powerful. Moreover, Diamond dismisses politics, religion, culture, individuals, and timing. For example, consider Cortez's victory over the Aztecs. Cortez's victory was not assured. Many elements had to be aligned for a few hundred Spaniards to overcome a mighty empire. The odds were really in Montezuma's favor. Even with horses, armor, and guns, the Aztecs were easily a match for Cortez. The Spanish armor was superfluous. According to Keegan, they even shed their heavy armor in favor of the native quilt vests. The firearms at that time were not quick to reload, so sheer numbers could have overwhelmed the Spanish. The Aztecs lost because of politics, religion, and individuals. The brutal politics and religion of the Aztecs made their subjects hate them. The Spanish were immediately supported with armies and food by the smaller nations like the Totonacs that hated the Aztecs for their cruelty. The insatiable appetite of the Aztec gods for human sacrifices insured that Cortez found ready allies. If either Montezuma or Cortez had been composed of slightly different temperaments the war could easily have gone the other way. Had Montezuma been more decisive, he could have had Cortez killed at the coast. Had Cortez not been so incredibly determined to take the country, he could have just returned to Spain with a load of the early gold presents sent to him. History is determined by far more than geography, plants, and animals. Culture, religion, individuals, politics, and timing all play important roles. My criticisms have nothing to do with "political correctness", but rather I take issue with Diamond's style of revisionist history that does not emphasize the influence and significance of non-European civilizations towards current Western civilization. While reading the book, I was frequently second guessing the facts of Jared Diamond because they were either inexact or vague. In closing, as an introduction to anthropology and a cogent depiction of one school of thought on the rise of the West this book is marvelous. However, it needs to be approached with an open-mind as it has some of its faults. Reflect on the thesis and the supporting evidence, and then draw your own conclusions. Love it or hate it, you owe it to yourself to read this book. As for me, this book is one of the best revisionist histories on the Ancient Civilizations but as the case with revisionist history, it has its share of one sided and extreme arguments. It is a good book but not great. Still, it is very simple to read and very easy to cognize which I think deserves the Pulitzer Prize it won.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2011
S
Verified Purchase
S.
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Must have!
Format: Hardcover
Excellent. Not just pictures but also retrospective commentary, better in that than some other game art books out there which are just images without context. And of course these games are incredibly artful and the images themselves are worth looking at. Beautiful book inside and out
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Amr
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect
Format: Hardcover
This was my first book purchase, top notch quality and the feeling every page as you touch and turn it is satisfying, delivery was also earlier than anticipated. Some of the concept art in the book is available online if you know where to look, but there are some never seen before art in there too, plus the tidbits shared by the developers is nice and gives cool behind the scenes information, overall a great deal for any Deus Ex fan.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2024
C
Verified Purchase
Christian Romero
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Yes, I Absolutely Asked For This.
Format: Hardcover
The Art of the Deus Ex Universe is a gorgeous artbook that encompasses Eidos Montreal’s past two Deus Ex games, Deus Ex Human Revolution and Deus Ex Mankind Divided. It starts with the foreword by the creator of Deus Ex Warren Spector who talks about the game he created being a classic and giving his approval of the latest games saying they keep the spirit of the original alive. From there you get five chapters of great art and behind the scenes commentary by the Art Director Jonathan Jacques-Belletete and Martin Dubeau. The five chapters are in order characters, weapons and tech, locations, the breach, and in-game adverts. The last two are short and brief compared to the first three chapters. You see the concepts on how they nailed the uniques aesthetic designs of Human Revolution and Mankind Divided. The “cyber-renaissance” look, as the art director calls it. The art style of these games give off a Cyberpunk dystopian look; that does not seem too far fetched to believe might happen. The Art of the Deus Ex Universe is a fantastic art book you get two games in one art book. You get good looking art concepts and fun making of Deus Ex facts. Such as the colors pink, violet and purple do not exist in the world of Deus Ex giving the visual metaphor of Eliza Cassan being an AI as she the only person who wears purple in the entire two games. There are many fun facts like that all over the art book as well as the beautiful artwork. A must for Deus Ex afficandos!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018

recommand products