SKU: 50830250172
best herbicide for ponds

best herbicide for ponds Tribune Diquat Herbicide

Sale price$23.88 Regular price$26.53
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.63 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 24 - Jul 29

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

best herbicide for ponds Tribune Diquat HerbicideTribune Diquat 2L Herbicide Fast Acting Aquatic Herbicide & Algaecide for Weed and Algae Management Tribune Diquat 2L Herbicide is a professional strength contact herbicide and algaecide formulated to provide rapid control of a wide range of aquatic weeds and nuisance vegetation. Powered by 37. 3% diquat dibromide, this fast acting formulation disrupts the photosynthetic process in treated plants, causing rapid desiccation and visible plant injury

Tribune Diquat 2L Herbicide

Fast-Acting Aquatic Herbicide & Algaecide for Weed and Algae Management

Tribune Diquat 2L Herbicide is a professional-strength contact herbicide and algaecide formulated to provide rapid control of a wide range of aquatic weeds and nuisance vegetation. Powered by 37.3% diquat dibromide, this fast-acting formulation disrupts the photosynthetic process in treated plants, causing rapid desiccation and visible plant injury shortly after application. It is widely used in ponds, lakes, reservoirs, drainage canals, irrigation systems, and other managed aquatic environments where dependable vegetation control is required.

Designed for broad-spectrum aquatic weed management, Tribune effectively controls many submerged, floating, and emergent aquatic plant species. Its contact mode of action provides quick results on actively growing vegetation while helping improve access, water flow, aesthetics, and overall waterbody management. Because it acts on contact, thorough coverage of target vegetation is important for optimum performance.

Key Features & Benefits

Feature Benefit
37.3% Diquat Dibromide Professional-strength active ingredient for fast vegetation control
Rapid Contact Activity Begins disrupting plant photosynthesis shortly after application
Broad-Spectrum Aquatic Weed Control Effective on many submerged, floating, and emergent aquatic weeds
Algaecide Activity Helps suppress nuisance algae in managed water bodies
Flexible Aquatic Use Sites Suitable for ponds, lakes, reservoirs, canals, and irrigation systems when used according to label directions
Easy-to-Mix Liquid Formulation Provides convenient handling and application
Fast Visible Results Treated vegetation typically shows rapid desiccation and decline

Product Specifications

Specification Details
Product Name Tribune Diquat 2L Herbicide
Active Ingredient Diquat Dibromide
Active Ingredient Concentration 37.3%
Diquat Cation Equivalent 2 lbs. per gallon
Formulation Type Liquid Concentrate
EPA Registration Number 100-1390
Primary Use Aquatic Weed and Algae Control
Mode of Action Contact Herbicide (Photosystem I Electron Diversion - Group 22)

Target Aquatic Vegetation

Tribune is commonly used to manage many troublesome aquatic weeds and algae, including:

Vegetation Type Examples
Submerged Weeds Watermilfoil, coontail, elodea and other submerged species
Floating Weeds Duckweed and similar floating vegetation
Emergent Weeds Various shoreline and emergent aquatic plants
Algae Certain nuisance algae species commonly found in ponds and lakes

Control levels may vary depending on weed species, growth stage, water conditions, and application timing. Always follow label directions for specific treatment recommendations.

Why Choose Tribune Diquat 2L?

For pond managers, aquatic professionals, property owners, and water resource managers seeking rapid vegetation control, Tribune Diquat 2L provides dependable performance and broad-spectrum activity. Its fast contact action quickly suppresses unwanted aquatic weeds and algae, helping restore water flow, improve appearance, and support effective aquatic vegetation management programs. When applied according to label directions, Tribune delivers reliable results across a wide range of aquatic environments.

Not for Sale to: CT, NH, NJ, NY, VT, and WA (Restricted Use Product, Licensed Applicators Only)

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 50830250172

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell best herbicide for ponds

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 13 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
H
Verified Purchase
Hubert Herring
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
great resource for high school parents
Format: Paperback
A terrific book -- on many levels. It is, first, a series of excellent suspense stories, with vivid characterizations of the students seeking admission to Wesleyan. The author found some fascinating students to follow, with the result that the reader really cares what happens to them. Even more important -- especially to someone about to embark on the college hunt -- he provides an invaluable insight into how the admissions process works. The admissions game, I now realize thanks to this splendid tale, is a crazy-quilt mixture: at Wesleyan, at least, the process focuses on the individual, quirks and all, far more than I imagined. At the same time, the process comes off as frighteningly random -- with so much depending on which admissions officer reads the application, and what that person focuses on in the few minutes available. The book is also a vivid reminder that admissions officers are people, too -- people of infinite variety. So it was a pleasure to read -- and it will also prove immensely useful to parents. One common theme kept repeating: take the hard courses, even if it means lower grades. Another: having a passion is a real plus, but the rest of the record can't be a disaster. But those are just the beginning.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 11, 2003
B
Verified Purchase
Brian Tarbox
Draper, US
★★★★★ 4
Very accurate view of admission (I worked there); compelling read, enlightening even for people who think they already know
Format: Kindle
I was a Senior Interviewer during my senior year at Wesleyan 1981 and so I worked with many of the main characters in the book. Although the book describes a later time period it rang entirely true to me. The volume of applications...the controlled chaos...the searching for a hook or a champion for an application was very familiar. At least at Wes it seemed (and seems) that unless one's application has some unusual feature that the school is looking for that year (a particular athlete or a particular musician or a particular tough background that was overcome) the road to admission will be challenging. An area that did surprise me was the emphasis on the family of the applicant...and the degree to which an applicant was held to a higher standard if their parents were deemed to be college fluent. I guess this makes sense and actually provides a leveling of the playing field but it was surprising none the less. It may also be surprising to some that these days you don't just need to convince the gatekeepers that you could be successful at the school..you must also show how your presence would enhance the school. This is of course an enormous burden for most teenagers. Like it or not this is the reality at many "top" schools. If you or your child is applying to college you owe it to yourself to read this book....either to understand the game or to make an informed decision not to play.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2013
P
Verified Purchase
P. Meltzer
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
What is better? The overachieving 6 or underachieving 8?
Format: Hardcover
First, let me say that I thought that this was an excellent book and would recommend it to anyone who is at all interested in the college admissions process. Second, I was surprised at how many of the reviewers seemed shocked--shocked!--that applicants got bonus points for coming from minority backgrounds. Was this some kind of revelation? However one thing that surprised me a little bit is how--even moving beyond race entirely--the more advantages you have had in life, the more disadvantageous it will be for your admissions process. For example, I was unaware that having successful parents would be, in essence, held against you on the theory that more would be expected of you. While other reviewers have (jokingly?) said that they would advise their white kids not to check the "Caucasian" box, I might advise my (still very young) kids to say that their parents have been unemployed their whole life. I suppose that the main issue which this whole process really boils down to is the following: As a college applicant, is it more important to succeed in life relative to the world around you (i.e. relative to your classmates, to others of your race, to others of your geographical area, to your own parents' life and accomplishments, etc.) or is it more important to succeed absolutely and not on a relative scale. This book clearly informs us that the answer is the former and not the latter. Whether that should be the answer is another question. For example, say that a student's entire life could be distilled into 2 numbers each on a sliding scale from 1-10. The first number is simply your academic performance (grades, SAT's, course load, etc.) The second number is your background (race, economic circumstances, gender, etc.) In the case of Wesleyan, it seems clear to me that they would rather have a student whose first number was, say, a 6 if his or her second was a 2 (take Mig for example in Steinberg's book) than a student whose first number was an 8 if the second number was a 9 or 10 (take Tiffany Wang for example). Whether that is the right approach is certainly a legitimate issue for discusion and I'm not saying that it's not. I suppose that one of the things that would be interesting to know (even though one never really can know of course) is whether those numbers will change in the future. For example, if one were to know that Mig would always be a 6 and Tiffany would always be an 8, would that change the analysis as to which is the right approach? I suspect that part of the reason that a school like Wesleyan would favor the overachieving 6 over the underachieving 8 is due to the hope or expectation that those trends will continue in the future and that one day the 6 will actually be ahead of the 8. And maybe that's the way it works. Who knows.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2003
J
Verified Purchase
Jeremy W.
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
You will find out how a selective private college evaluate and admit students
Format: Paperback
I'm a high school counselor and college advisor. Fifteen years ago when I started my college counseling position, I struggled to understand or explain to students and their parents how a selective private college evaluate and admit students. It was this book that helped me understand the essence of selective private college admissions. Compared to other dry theory books, this book tells the admissions practice as stories that are easy to read, understand, and associate with. I highly recommend this book to students, parents, and new counselors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2024
M
Verified Purchase
M. Tucker
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 3
Who edited this mess?!?!?!?
Format: Kindle
This is a very interesting work of nonfiction. I found it intriguing and read it very quickly. I actually got invested in these students and their stories and their journey to get admitted to the college that was right for them. BUT, and this is a big but, this book is so poorly edited, it is disgraceful! If a person were reading this for research purposes, and it could be useful for just that, good luck to them. The dates are all over the place. At one point, the kids are being considered for the class of 2004, then it makes a reference to the current year as 2000, then it reverts back to 2004 for a long while, then it mentions how the kids--currently at their various chosen colleges--reacted to the events of 9/11/01. What the hell? It's very confusing. It makes it very difficult to keep things in context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2013

recommand products