SKU: 53590660665
lavender ice plant

lavender ice plant Buy Purple Ice Plant Phoenix, AZ | Delosperma cooperi

Sale price$18.59 Regular price$20.65
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.16 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 11 - Aug 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

lavender ice plant Buy Purple Ice Plant Phoenix, AZ | Delosperma cooperiPhoenix's Favorite Low Water Groundcover Purple Ice Plant Purple Ice Plant (Delosperma cooperi) is one of the most eye catching drought tolerant groundcovers you can plant in the Phoenix Valley. Its succulent, mat forming habit smothers weeds, controls erosion, and rewards you with a carpet of vivid purple blooms that draw pollinators from spring through fall. Unlike most flowering groundcovers, this plant truly thrives on neglect low water, minimal

Phoenix's Favorite Low-Water Groundcover — Purple Ice Plant

Purple Ice Plant (Delosperma cooperi) is one of the most eye-catching drought-tolerant groundcovers you can plant in the Phoenix Valley. Its succulent, mat-forming habit smothers weeds, controls erosion, and rewards you with a carpet of vivid purple blooms that draw pollinators from spring through fall. Unlike most flowering groundcovers, this plant truly thrives on neglect — low water, minimal fertilizer, and Phoenix's intense summer heat. Whether you're covering a bare slope in Scottsdale, adding low-maintenance color along a Chandler driveway, or filling gaps in a Mesa desert garden bed, Purple Ice Plant delivers season-long beauty with almost zero effort.

Purple Ice Plant Plant Details

Attribute Detail
Scientific Name Delosperma cooperi
Common Names Purple Ice Plant, Hardy Ice Plant, Trailing Ice Plant
Mature Height 3–6 inches
Mature Width 18–24 inches (spreads as a mat)
Growth Rate Moderate — fills in well within one season in Phoenix
Sun Full sun (6+ hrs). Thrives with reflected heat from walls and pavement.
Water Low once established. Extremely drought-tolerant succulent.
USDA Zones 5–11 (Phoenix is Zone 9b–10a — ideal)
Soil Well-draining. Tolerates Arizona caliche soils with proper drainage.
Foliage Semi-evergreen — fleshy, succulent leaves stay green most of the year
Bloom Color Vivid purple/magenta daisy-like flowers, spring through fall

Purple Ice Plant Uses in Phoenix Landscapes

Low-Water Slope and Erosion Control

Purple Ice Plant's creeping, mat-forming growth makes it ideal for stabilizing slopes and hillsides in Phoenix neighborhoods. Its dense root system binds soil against monsoon washouts while suppressing weeds. Plant 12–18 inches apart across a slope for full coverage within one growing season — a much cheaper and more attractive alternative to gravel or bark mulch.

Rock Garden and Desert Landscape Filler

The succulent foliage and vivid purple blooms contrast beautifully with desert boulders and gravel in modern Phoenix landscaping. Use it to fill gaps between boulders, along dry streambeds, or as a low-maintenance accent among agaves and cacti. It pairs especially well with Yellow Bells, Desert Marigold, and Agave for a stunning, low-water composition that blooms most of the year.

Pollinator Garden Groundcover

From late spring through fall, Purple Ice Plant's daisy-like blooms are a magnet for bees and butterflies — making it an excellent choice for Phoenix pollinator gardens. Plant in drifts of 5–10 plants for the most impact. Its bloom period complements other Three Timbers pollinator plants like Texas Sage and Ruellia, extending the season of color in your yard.

Pool-Friendly Edging and Border Plant

Purple Ice Plant's low, spreading habit makes it perfect for pool-area borders in Gilbert, Peoria, and Tempe. It creates a soft, lush edge without dropping leaves or large debris into the water. Its bright purple flowers add color poolside during the warm season when you're using the space most.

Best Time to Plant Purple Ice Plant in Phoenix

Fall (October–November) is the best planting window. The soil stays warm enough for root development while cooler air reduces transplant stress — and the plant gets 6–8 months of root establishment before facing its first Phoenix summer. Spring (February–April) is a solid second-best option. Avoid planting in peak summer heat (June–August) if you can help it, as new transplants need extra irrigation support during the monsoon gap.

How to Plant Purple Ice Plant

  1. Dig wide, not deep — 2x the width of the root ball at the same depth. Purple Ice Plant has shallow roots and doesn't like sitting in a deep hole.
  2. Check for caliche — break through any hardpan layer to ensure water drains away from the roots. Soggy soil is this plant's only real enemy.
  3. Backfill with native soil — a light 20% organic amendment is fine. Avoid heavy compost that retains too much moisture.
  4. Spacing — 12–18 inches apart for groundcover use; 24 inches for individual accent plants.
  5. Water basin — build a 2–3 inch ring around the plant to direct water to roots at establishment.
  6. Mulch — 1–2 inches of gravel mulch (not wood chips) to retain moisture without holding excess water against the crown.

Watering Purple Ice Plant in Phoenix

First Year Watering Schedule

  • Weeks 1–2: Every 2–3 days, deep and slow
  • Month 1–2: Every 4–5 days
  • Month 3–6: Every 7–10 days (5–7 days in peak summer)
  • After Year 1: Every 14–21 days in summer; rainfall alone may suffice in winter

Drip Irrigation

Place emitters 12–15 inches from the crown of each plant. A 0.5–1 GPH emitter running 20–30 minutes is ideal for established plants in the growing season. Once Purple Ice Plant is established, it's one of the most water-efficient groundcovers in the Phoenix palette — often surviving on rainwater alone in cooler months.

How fast does Purple Ice Plant grow in Phoenix?
In Phoenix, it spreads 12–18 inches in the first growing season under good conditions. By year two, individual plants typically fill their full 18–24 inch spread. Fall-planted specimens establish quickly and often bloom by the following spring.

Is it truly drought-tolerant once established?
Yes — Delosperma cooperi is a succulent that stores water in its fleshy leaves. Once established (6–12 months in Phoenix), it can survive on supplemental water every 2–3 weeks in summer and little to no irrigation in winter. It's one of the best choices for water-wise Phoenix gardens.

Can Purple Ice Plant handle Phoenix summer heat?
Absolutely. Unlike many flowering groundcovers that go dormant in Phoenix summers, Purple Ice Plant continues to bloom through much of the hot season as long as it has good drainage. It especially thrives with reflected heat from south-facing walls and driveways.

Does Purple Ice Plant stay green year-round?
It is semi-evergreen in Phoenix. The foliage remains mostly green through mild winters. Temperatures below 20°F can cause some die-back, but Phoenix rarely sees those extremes — so most plants stay lush and green all year.

How does it do near a pool?
Purple Ice Plant is pool-friendly. It's a low, compact grower that doesn't drop significant debris, and it tolerates the occasional splash. Its bright blooms add color to pool areas during the warmer months when you're using the space most.

You May Also Like

Green Carpet Natal Plum — Another low-growing, drought-tolerant groundcover with glossy foliage and fragrant white flowers, ideal for Phoenix borders and slopes.

Texas Sage — Purple-blooming desert shrub that pairs beautifully with Purple Ice Plant for a coordinated color palette in low-water Phoenix gardens.

Ground Morning Glory — Spreading groundcover with silver foliage and white trumpet flowers, great for filling hot, dry areas in Phoenix and Scottsdale landscapes.

New Gold Lantana — Spreading, heat-loving groundcover with yellow blooms that complements Purple Ice Plant's purple flowers and thrives in the same sunny Phoenix conditions.

How Many Purple Ice Plant Do I Need?

Each plant spreads 18 to 24 inches wide. At 15 inch on-center spacing the succulent mat closes in within a season. Use the table below to estimate plant counts:

Area to Cover Plants Needed (15 in o.c.)
25 sq ft 16
50 sq ft 32
100 sq ft 64
200 sq ft 128

For erosion control on a slope, plant in staggered rows; tighten to 12 inch spacing for the fastest cover, or open to 18 inches to stretch a budget over a larger area.

Purple Ice Plant Season-by-Season in Phoenix

  • Spring (Feb–Apr): Vivid purple-magenta daisy blooms open over fresh succulent growth, drawing bees and butterflies. A strong second planting window.
  • Summer (May–Sep): Keeps blooming through much of the hot season where many groundcovers quit, especially with reflected heat off south walls and driveways. Monsoon rain (Jul–Sep) is plenty; back the drip way off in wet weeks since soggy soil is its only real enemy.
  • Fall (Oct–Nov): Prime planting season and a continued bloom flush as temperatures ease.
  • Winter (Dec–Jan): Stays mostly green and semi-evergreen through Valley winters. It is genuinely cold-hardy (rated to zone 5), so Phoenix frosts pose no threat; only sustained temperatures near 20°F cause minor dieback that recovers in spring.

At a Glance

✔ Drought-Tolerant   ✔ Heat-Loving (Reflected-Heat Tolerant)   ✔ Pool-Friendly (Low-Litter)   ✔ Pollinator-Friendly   ✔ Low-Maintenance   ✔ Cold-Hardy to 0°F

Plant It With

  • Green Carpet Natal Plum: a glossy, fragrant-flowered groundcover to weave alongside for contrasting texture.
  • Texas Sage: a purple-blooming shrub backdrop that coordinates with the magenta flowers.
  • Red Ice Plant: a sister Delosperma in red for a two-tone succulent carpet.
  • AZ Ice Plant (Copper): a copper-toned ice plant for a multi-color bloom drift in full sun.

Is Purple Ice Plant Right for Your Yard?

Purple Ice Plant is a top choice for full-sun slopes, rock gardens, pollinator drifts, and pool-edge borders with sharp drainage, where its long bloom season and reflected-heat tolerance shine on almost no water. It is not a fit for shade or for heavy, poorly drained soil that stays wet, where the shallow succulent crown will rot.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 53590660665

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell lavender ice plant

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
U
UJ
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Comprehensive, invaluable resource
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This set is just massive. There is so much depth and insight, I don't know that I'll ever get to it all. One could literally read these volumes cover to cover because they're simply interesting and thought provoking. That said, I think it's best taken in small doses, perhaps focusing on single verses as they arise in daily life or in bible study. The physical quality of the volumes is top notch as well. This set would work well in a private library but could be equally appropriate for a church library. Absolutely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2025
P
Peter P
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Valued study tool
Format: Hardcover
This resource is phenomenal. I’ve been including this commentary set in my resources to teach through the minor prophets, and I find myself really appreciating its solid, accurate, grace-filled contents. This includes the ESV text, supporting timelines, graphics, and charts, and expansive commentary supporting the text. This set will be a valued study tool for years to come.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
A
Andrew D. Lossing
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Imposing and Exceptional Quality
Format: Hardcover
The content and quality of the ESV commentary series matches that of their study Bibles. Broadly reformed, but not dogmatic on a particular angle, clear and concise, great for study. This commentary set isn't so much for digging deep in the weeds as it is for learning a solid Biblical Theology-based framework of the Bible. It's simpler than some, but much more in-depth than the ESV Study Bible, making it the next step for learning. The full set is imposing - lovely big, black hardbacks which look phenomenal on a bookshelf. Do I think this is practical for everybody? No, it might not be. You can get this kind of thing in digital form in one way or another these days (please understand that I don't like to go quite that digital, and I haven't researched what all is available). If you're pressed for living space, you might not want these. I live with a spouse in a midsize one-bedroom apartment. Fortunately, we already knew we wanted to prioritize some of our space for physical books, because we find pleasure in them. I will have to clear off some of my existing bookshelf space and relegate some books to a box in storage (consider that this set takes up all the space in a fairly large packing box, and you'll know how much you need). But it's worth it for me. I also see the acquisition of this box set as a bit of a prompt to take back up more in-depth study of the Scripture, which too often gets sidetracked by the rest of life getting in the way. Having the physical books are already something of a commitment. If all I had were ebooks or an app, I would likely never utilize them the same way. Last notes: these were packed very well. Each volume is shrink-wrapped in cellophane and none of the corners were damaged. They did a good job with that. Lastly, the price for these is fairly high. I acknowledge that. I think theological books are about on the same level, usually, however. So I did not see the need to deduct a star.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2025
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick S.
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint. The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well. Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here). Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to. Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits. Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job. Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus. The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus. Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it). My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009

recommand products