SKU: 75727897556
plant fertilizer pellets

plant fertilizer pellets Soil Acidifier Sulfur Fertilizer Pellet

Sale price$25.70 Regular price$28.56
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.14 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

plant fertilizer pellets Soil Acidifier Sulfur Fertilizer PelletSoil Acidifier Granular Sulfur Pellets Premium Pelletized Sulfur for Correcting High Soil pH Soil Acidifier Granular Sulfur Pellets are specially formulated to help reduce high soil pH levels and improve growing conditions for plants that thrive in acidic soils. Manufactured with premium elemental sulfur and pelletized for easy application, this professional grade soil amendment gradually lowers alkalinity while supporting improved nutrient

Soil Acidifier Granular Sulfur Pellets

Premium Pelletized Sulfur for Correcting High Soil pH

Soil Acidifier Granular Sulfur Pellets are specially formulated to help reduce high soil pH levels and improve growing conditions for plants that thrive in acidic soils. Manufactured with premium elemental sulfur and pelletized for easy application, this professional-grade soil amendment gradually lowers alkalinity while supporting improved nutrient availability, stronger root systems, and healthier plant growth.

Designed for residential landscapes, home gardens, lawns, turfgrass, ornamental plantings, and agricultural applications, these sulfur pellets provide a long-lasting and effective solution for correcting “sweet” or alkaline soils. The low-dust pelletized formulation spreads evenly and activates naturally through soil moisture and microbial activity for gradual, dependable performance.


Guaranteed Analysis

Component Analysis
Free Sulfur (S) 90.0%
Other Ingredients 10% Bentonite
Sulfur Source Elemental Sulfur

The bentonite component helps improve pellet integrity and assists with gradual soil incorporation after watering.


Key Benefits

Feature Benefit
High Sulfur Content Helps efficiently lower alkaline soil pH
Pelletized Formula Cleaner, low-dust application with improved spreadability
Gradual Soil Conditioning Provides long-lasting pH management
Enhances Nutrient Availability Helps plants utilize soil nutrients more effectively
Supports Acid-Loving Plants Ideal for azaleas, gardenias, camellias, blueberries, and more
Helps Correct Yellowing Assists with chlorosis caused by high pH conditions
Versatile Use Suitable for lawns, landscapes, gardens, and ornamentals

Understanding Soil pH

Soil pH measures the acidity or alkalinity of soil on a scale ranging from 0 to 14, with 7 considered neutral. Numbers below 7 indicate acidic soil, while values above 7 indicate alkaline soil. Many plants require specific pH ranges for proper nutrient absorption and healthy growth.

When soil pH becomes too high, plants may struggle to absorb essential nutrients such as iron and manganese, often resulting in yellowing foliage, poor vigor, and reduced growth. Sulfur-based soil acidifiers help gradually lower pH to create more favorable growing conditions.


Recommended pH Ranges

Plant Type Ideal Soil pH
Bahia Grass, Carpet Grass, Centipede Grass 5.5 – 6.0
Bermuda Grass, St. Augustine, Zoysia 6.0 – 6.5
Citrus, Mangoes, Avocados 5.5 – 6.5
Most Vegetables 6.0 – 7.0
Azaleas, Camellias, Gardenias, Holly, Ixora, Magnolia 4.5 – 5.5
Bougainvillea, Palms, Poinsettias 5.5 – 6.0
Roses, Hibiscus, Viburnum, Boxwood 6.0 – 7.0

 


Ideal For Acid-Loving Plants

  • Azaleas

  • Camellias

  • Gardenias

  • Holly

  • Ixora

  • Magnolia Trees

  • Blueberries

  • Hydrangeas

  • Evergreen Shrubs

  • Bahia Grass

  • Centipede Grass

These plants commonly show nutrient deficiencies and yellowing when grown in overly alkaline soils.


Landscape & Garden Application Rates

Application Area Recommended Rate
Garden Beds & Landscapes 1 lb. per 100 sq. ft. for each pH unit reduction
Large Areas 10 lbs. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Trees & Shrubs Apply beneath branch spread to the drip line

Application Tips

  • Apply evenly over dry foliage

  • Water thoroughly after application

  • Allow at least 2 months between treatments

  • Do not exceed 3 applications annually

 


Turfgrass & Lawn Application Rates

Turf Type Recommended Application
Lawns & Turfgrass 10–15 lbs. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Small Areas 1–1.5 lbs. per 100 sq. ft.

Turf Application Instructions

  • Apply using a broadcast or fertilizer spreader

  • Apply only to dry grass blades

  • Water immediately after application

  • Space applications at least 2 months apart

  • Maximum of 3 applications per year

 


Common Signs of High Soil pH

Symptom Possible Cause
Yellowing Leaves Iron deficiency caused by alkaline soil
Poor Flower Production Nutrient lockout from improper pH
Slow Growth Reduced nutrient uptake
Pale Turfgrass Soil pH too high for healthy chlorophyll production

Product Specifications

Specification Details
Product Type Soil Acidifier
Formulation Pelletized Granules
Primary Ingredient Elemental Sulfur
Sulfur Content 90%
Application Method Broadcast Spreader or Hand Application
Use Areas Lawns, Gardens, Landscapes, Ornamentals
Release Action Gradual Soil Acidification

Why Choose Soil Acidifier Granular Sulfur Pellets?

Maintaining proper soil pH is essential for maximizing plant health, nutrient efficiency, and overall landscape performance. Soil Acidifier Granular Sulfur Pellets provide a professional-grade solution for lowering alkaline soil conditions while supporting healthier root systems and greener growth. The easy-to-spread pelletized formula delivers consistent coverage with reduced dust, making it an excellent choice for homeowners, landscapers, gardeners, and turf professionals seeking reliable soil pH management.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 75727897556

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell plant fertilizer pellets

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
A
Amy Sullivan
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Provocative and fascinating read
Format: Paperback
Justin Driver's excellent book makes the case that conservatives may come to regret the Supreme Court's 2023 decision striking down affirmative action in college admissions. He argues that, rather than simply check a box to indicate their race, the decision will force non-white applicants to "perform their trauma" in application essays in ways that conservatives may find even more corrosive. And affluent non-white candidates--the people conservatives say should not be benefiting from affirmative action--will be the ones best-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity, since they are most equipped to exploit the loopholes and work-arounds that the Roberts decision created. A truly provocative read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
K
Kindle Customer
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
A Powerful and Timely Book about Fairness and Equality in America
Format: Kindle
This book is beautifully written and deeply engaging. As a non-lawyer, I appreciated the author's ability to cut through legal abstraction to reveal what is truly at stake as the Supreme Court turns away from policies designed to expand opportunity. Driver writes, with clarity and conviction, that genuine equality demands more than the pretense that race no longer matters. The result is a powerful and thought-provoking work that reminds us the pursuit of fairness in America remains unfinished.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025

recommand products