SKU: 96443518594
ornamental san pedro cactus

ornamental san pedro cactus Buy San Pedro Cactus Phoenix, AZ | Echinopsis pachanoi

Sale price$23.18 Regular price$25.75
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.44 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 12 - Aug 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

ornamental san pedro cactus Buy San Pedro Cactus Phoenix, AZ | Echinopsis pachanoiA Towering Columnar Cactus for Phoenix Desert Gardens San Pedro The San Pedro Cactus (Echinopsis pachanoi) is one of the fastest growing columnar cacti available for Phoenix landscapes. Native to the Andes Mountains, this striking blue green cactus grows tall, ribbed columns that branch with age into dramatic multi stemmed specimens. San Pedro can reach 1020 feet tall in the Phoenix Valley, adding bold vertical structure to xeriscape gardens,

A Towering Columnar Cactus for Phoenix Desert Gardens — San Pedro

The San Pedro Cactus (Echinopsis pachanoi) is one of the fastest-growing columnar cacti available for Phoenix landscapes. Native to the Andes Mountains, this striking blue-green cactus grows tall, ribbed columns that branch with age into dramatic multi-stemmed specimens. San Pedro can reach 10–20 feet tall in the Phoenix Valley, adding bold vertical structure to xeriscape gardens, courtyard plantings, and modern desert designs. It produces spectacular large white flowers that bloom at night during summer — a rare treat for any garden. Whether you’re creating a sculptural cactus garden in Scottsdale, anchoring a Chandler desert border, or adding architectural drama to a Mesa backyard — San Pedro delivers fast growth and jaw-dropping form.

San Pedro Cactus Plant Details

Attribute Detail
Scientific Name Echinopsis pachanoi (syn. Trichocereus pachanoi)
Common Names San Pedro Cactus, Saint Peter Cactus
Mature Height 10–20 feet
Mature Width 4–6 feet (multi-branched clump)
Growth Rate Fast for a cactus — 1–2 feet per year in Phoenix
Sun Full sun to light shade. Handles reflected heat well.
Water Low once established. Drought-tolerant but appreciates occasional deep watering.
USDA Zones 9–11 (Phoenix is Zone 9b–10a)
Soil Well-draining required. Thrives in sandy, rocky Arizona soils and handles caliche with drainage.
Foliage Evergreen — blue-green ribbed columns year-round
Bloom Large white nocturnal flowers in summer — fragrant and spectacular

San Pedro Cactus Uses in Phoenix Landscapes

Sculptural Focal Point & Cactus Gardens

San Pedro’s tall, ribbed columns create dramatic vertical architecture in any desert garden. Plant a single specimen as a living sculpture in a Scottsdale courtyard, or group 3–5 for a columnar cactus grove effect. Pair with Golden Barrel, Totem Pole Cactus, and Mexican Fencepost for an all-columnar desert statement garden.

Modern Desert Borders & Property Screens

Because San Pedro branches and fills in with age, it makes an effective living screen or border plant. Space 3–4 feet apart along a Chandler property line or Gilbert fence to create a striking green wall. The columns grow fast enough to provide meaningful screening within 3–5 years.

Pool-Friendly & Low-Litter Plantings

San Pedro is an excellent pool-adjacent plant — it produces virtually no leaf litter, requires minimal trimming, and its smooth columns and minimal spines make it safer than many cacti. Plant along Tempe and Mesa pool perimeters for a clean, architectural look with zero maintenance debris.

Best Time to Plant San Pedro Cactus in Phoenix

Spring (March–May) is the ideal planting window. Warm soil and rising temperatures promote fast root establishment and active growth. Fall (October–November) is the second-best option. Avoid planting in winter — San Pedro is slightly frost-sensitive and roots best in warm soil.

How to Plant San Pedro Cactus

  1. Dig wide, not deep — excavate 2x the root ball width at the same depth. Cacti have shallow root systems.
  2. Ensure excellent drainage — break through any caliche layer. San Pedro will rot in standing water.
  3. Backfill with native soil — no amendments needed. Sandy, rocky Arizona soil is ideal.
  4. Spacing — 3–4 feet apart for a border or screen; 5+ feet for standalone specimens.
  5. Let the cut callus — if transplanting a cutting, let the cut end dry and callus for 1–2 weeks before planting.
  6. Gravel mulch — 2–3 inches of decomposed granite or gravel. Never use organic mulch that retains moisture.

Watering San Pedro Cactus in Phoenix

First Year Watering Schedule

  • Weeks 1–2: Every 5–7 days, light watering to settle soil
  • Months 1–2: Every 7–10 days
  • Months 3–6: Every 10–14 days
  • After Year 1: Every 2–3 weeks in summer; monthly or less in winter

Drip Irrigation

Place 1 emitter (1–2 GPH) 12–18 inches from the base. San Pedro appreciates more water than most columnar cacti, which helps it maintain its fast growth rate. However, always let the soil dry completely between waterings. Overwatering causes root rot.

How fast does San Pedro grow in Phoenix?
San Pedro is one of the fastest-growing columnar cacti, adding 1–2 feet per year in Phoenix with regular summer watering. A 5-gallon plant can reach 6–8 feet within 3–4 years.

Is San Pedro frost-hardy in Phoenix?
San Pedro handles most Phoenix winters well, tolerating temps down to about 25°F. During rare hard freezes, drape frost cloth over the plant. Established specimens are more cold-hardy than young ones.

Does San Pedro bloom?
Yes — mature San Pedro cacti produce large, spectacular white flowers that open at night during summer. The blooms are fragrant and typically last one night, attracting moths and bats. Plants usually begin blooming once they reach 4–6 feet tall.

How does San Pedro compare to Totem Pole Cactus?
Both are tall columnar cacti, but San Pedro has visible ribs and small spines, while Totem Pole (Pachycereus schottii ‘Monstrosus’) is smooth and spineless with a knobby texture. San Pedro grows faster and produces showy flowers. Both are excellent choices for Phoenix desert gardens.

You May Also Like

  • Totem Pole Cactus — a smooth, spineless columnar cactus with a unique sculptural form.
  • Mexican Fence Post — a tall, columnar cactus often used as a living fence in desert landscapes.
  • Golden Barrel Cactus — a round, golden-spined cactus that contrasts beautifully with tall columnar species.
  • Ocotillo — a spindly desert native with fiery red spring blooms, perfect for adding movement to cactus gardens.

How Many San Pedro Cactus Do I Need?

San Pedro works two ways: as a single sculptural specimen, or branched together into a fast-growing columnar screen. For a focal point, plant one and give it 5 to 6 feet of clear space so the multi-stemmed form can spread. For a living screen along a wall or property line, space the columns 3 to 4 feet apart:

Run length Plants at 3.5 ft spacing
10 ft 3 plants
20 ft 6 plants
30 ft 9 plants
40 ft 11 plants

For a grove effect, group 3 to 5 columns in odd numbers, each 3 to 4 feet apart, so the ribbed stems read as one bold cluster.

San Pedro Cactus Season-by-Season in Phoenix

  • Spring (Feb-Apr): Prime planting window. Warm soil drives fast root establishment and the first flush of new column growth.
  • Summer (May-Sep): Peak growth season, adding 1 to 2 feet with regular deep watering. Large fragrant white flowers open at night and draw moths and bats. Handles full reflected heat off walls and pavement.
  • Fall (Oct-Nov): Second-best planting window and continued growth before cooling. Taper watering as temperatures drop.
  • Winter (Dec-Jan): Evergreen blue-green structure holds all winter. Hardy to about 25°F: during a hard freeze, drape frost cloth over the columns, especially on young plants.

At a Glance

✔ Heat-Loving (Reflected-Heat Tolerant)   ✔ Drought-Tolerant   ✔ Pollinator-Friendly   ✔ Pool-Friendly (Low-Litter)   ✔ Evergreen   ✔ Low-Maintenance   ✔ Deer & Rabbit-Resistant   ✔ Cold-Hardy to 25°F

Plant It With

Is San Pedro Cactus Right for Your Yard?

San Pedro thrives in full sun to light shade with fast-draining soil, and it tolerates reflected heat off walls and pavement better than most columnar cacti. Give it room to branch and break through any caliche layer so water never pools at the roots. It is not a fit if your spot stays wet or shaded, or if you cannot cover it during a rare hard freeze while it is young.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 96443518594

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell ornamental san pedro cactus

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Alex Thompson
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Very fair and academic
Format: Paperback
Very good book. I agree with the authors conclusion and felt the portrayal was both fair and academical.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
C. Rohner
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
As Close As You Will Get To Objectivity
Format: Paperback
If you have read "No Man Knows My History," you have to read "Rough Stone Rolling." The former biography was written by Fawn Brodie, a scholar who grew up LDS but left the church disenchanted and not believing that Joseph Smith was what he claimed to be--a prophet. The latter written by Bushman, a practicing LDS scholar who believes that Joseph Smith was a prophet. In the preface of "Rough Stone Rolling," Bushman makes the legitimate point that there will never be consensus on Joseph Smith's character or achievements. Furthermore, he confesses that as a believing historian, pure objectivity is impossible. Nonetheless, I think he comes closer to pure objectivity in this history than any other I have read on Joseph Smith. This has to be one of the best biographies I have ever read. The book is well written, loaded with historical fact, and any assumptions that are made are within detailed, historical contexts. Unlike Brodie's biography, it is very difficult to ascertain Bushman's own opinion. If he had not confessed his belief in the preface, you would wonder. Nowhere does Bushman try to convince you that Smith was a prophet and he is not afraid to explore Joseph Smith's weaknesses and shortcomings as a man. I am a believer so I admit that I may just relate to Bushman better than Brodie. Still, I know many practicing Mormons that would not like this book simply because they have to have Joseph Smith on a pedestal, untouchable, and locked in a glass case. I also know many faithful non-Mormons who believe that a prophet is certainly not a god but is definitely something more than human. Such readers will probably not care for this book either. I believe Joseph Smith was a prophet but I also know he was a man with weaknesses, like every other prophet that came before him. In Bushman's own words, "flawless characters are neither attractive or useful." This is a history of a man; it is not scripture. After boldly claiming heavenly visions, Joseph Smith penned a few great books of scripture that are well worth reading if you really want to explore the faith. Fawn Brodie takes the title for her biography from Joseph Smith's own admission in 1844 that "No Man Knows My History" and paints, in her opinion, the delusion and deceit behind Smith's confession. Bushman takes the title for his biography from Joseph Smith's own admission in 1843 that he is a "Rough Stone Rolling" and gives you the most real, honest, and fair assessment of his life that I have ever read. He gives you the man Joseph Smith, with his strengths and weaknesses, and leaves the opinions to the reader.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 2013
J
Verified Purchase
J. A. White
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 3
Comprehensive, but not convincing to this non-believer
Format: Paperback
Having previously read Fawn Brodie's , I read this one to get the believer's view. Bushman is at his best describing the evolution of Smith's thinking and revelations. Although the book is long, it is well written and authoritative. It gives a deeper understanding of Smith's religious philosophy than does Brodie's book. To his credit, Bushman confronts many of the crucial controversies surrounding Smith. From my non-believer's perspective, however, the defenses of Smith are not remotely convincing. Some examples: 1. DNA analysis shows without question that the American Indians came from east Asia. This fact is in direct contradiction of the traditional LDS view that Native Americans are lost Israelites. Bushman argues that Smith may have been writing about a small tribe somewhere in New York, or about people outside North America altogether. Within a few pages, Bushman has forgotten about this controversy altogether, and happily describes the Book of Mormon as a history of the American Indians. 2. Smith made the huge mistake of reproducing parts of the hieroglyphics he claims to have interpreted as the "Book of Abraham." These documents have been translated by scholars and have nothing to do with Abraham. Bushman (pp. 291-2) puts forth the argument that Smith's translation may not have been a true translation, but instead may have been a divine revelation simply inspired by the presence of the scrolls. Bushman suggests the same for the Book of Mormon. This is a truly shocking stance for an LDS believer to take: if Smith's "translations" weren't translations, why should anyone believe that his revelations were divinely inspired? Ironically, Bushman's view here sounds much like Brodie's: Not anticipating that scholars would use the Rosetta stone to translate hieroglyphics, Smith imagined that bogus translations would not be found out. 3. Smith repeatedly lied about whether he and the Saints were practicing polygamy. Bushman's defense of Smith in this context reminds me of Bill Clinton's statements regarding Monica Lewinsky: Smith held a secret definition of the term "polygamy," and thus felt free to mislead (or lie) with impunity. The facts, as reported by both Brodie and Bushman, support the conclusion that Smith coerced women into his bed by arguing that their eternal salvation was at stake. The stain of Smith's lustful "revelation" regarding polygamy continues to haunt the LDS, which claims to recoil from earthly polygamy but argues that men (not women) get to have harems in heaven. Despite these complaints, I recommend this book to non-believers who are patient enough to get through it. I feel that I have much greater insight into the LDS mindset than I did before.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2008
I
Verified Purchase
Ian
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
The definitive paperback edition
Format: Paperback
I purchased the Oxford World's Classics edition of "Le Morte d'Arthur: The Winchester Manuscript" for a school reading assignment, and I can say with confidence that this is the version you want. The original Old English is present (it was virtually a new language), complete with very useful footnotes to assist with antiquated words and phrases. The story was intriguing, colorful, and poignant (it's a downer, but a well-written one), filled with memorable characters such as Sir Gareth and Sir Launcelot. If you have a taste for classic literature and are looking for a challenge, definitely give "Le Morte d'Arthur" a read, especially with this version.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2023
J
Verified Purchase
Josephine DiNovo
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
This copy is an excellent modernization of Malory's text with helpful footnotes and endnotes
Format: Paperback
I got this book for class, so I've only read large segements of it. This copy is an excellent modernization of Malory's text with helpful footnotes and endnotes. The footnotes were always available to explain unfamiliar words without interrupting the flow of the story.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2016

recommand products