Pay in installments of $7.49 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 16 - Aug 21
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
schlafsack 90 cm sommer Schlafsack Sommer 90 cm Wild Flowers OliveDer Little Dutch Schlafsack ohne rmel ist ideal fr warme Sommertage und lsst Ihr Kind bequem und sicher schlafen. Mit einem Schlafsack kann sich Ihr Kind weniger leicht vom Rcken auf den Bauch drehen, schwieriger aus dem Bett klettern und sich nicht freistrampeln. Der Schlafsack verfgt ber einen Reiverschluss auf der Vorderseite, der von oben nach unten schliet. So kann Ihr Kind den Schlafsack nicht alleine ausziehen. Artikelnummer: TE11421011 EAN:
Der Little Dutch Schlafsack ohne Ärmel ist ideal für warme Sommertage und lässt Ihr Kind bequem und sicher schlafen. Mit einem Schlafsack kann sich Ihr Kind weniger leicht vom Rücken auf den Bauch drehen, schwieriger aus dem Bett klettern und sich nicht freistrampeln. Der Schlafsack verfügt über einen Reißverschluss auf der Vorderseite, der von oben nach unten schließt. So kann Ihr Kind den Schlafsack nicht alleine ausziehen.Artikelnummer: TE11421011
EAN: 8720168532732
Maße: 90cm
Größe: 90 cm
Material: 100% Baumwolle
Farbe: Olive
Spezialisierung: Ohne Ärmel -
Waschhinweis:Ja Waschen bei 30 ° C; bügeln bei niedriger Temperatur; nicht chemisch reinigen; nicht bleichen; Nicht für Wäschetrockner geeignet
Herstellerland: Türkei
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Perfect Jeans!
Size: 26, Color: Verified Vintage, Size: 26, Color: Verified Vintage
Love these jeans, so soft and lightweight but with all the usual Levi’s class. I bought them in three different colors. They’re so well fitting and comfortable to wear. Im 5’5 140 pounds and it is true to size. The perfect fit every time.!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Classics! Good material with no stretch.
Size: 28, Color: Verified Vintage
I am in love with these jeans. I ordered another pair in a different wash. I also sized up two sizes but I like the looser, slouchy fit.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Back to the 70s
I love these. They fit perfect in the waist but are roomy else where.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2025
★★★★★ 5
My favorite ever jean, I have a pair in every color
Size: 26, Color: Not My News Channel
I’m a little lanky (5’9”, 125-130lbs) and I want to like wide leg/baggy jeans so bad but every time I try them on, they look ridiculous on me. I look like a straight line in them, or they’re so baggy I feel like I’m wearing a costume. These have the baggy look I’ve been searching for for years but in an understated way that doesn’t make me feel shapeless. I’m also convinced that the buttons are more flattering over the fupa than a zipper. It’s like a hidden corset vs. a zipper that contours to your shape.
If you’re in between sizes, definitely size down. Even if you’re not, you may still want to size down or buy both and return the one you don’t like
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Too short
Size: 29W x 30L, Color: Ecru Booper No Damage
Sadly not meant for tall people.
I am 6” and these jeans are at least 3 inches too short, so i will be returning them. Disappointing that they don’t come in tall.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2026